We want to clear up this problem.

Let's try to clear up this misunderstanding.

This is an actual study, and let me clarify.

Under Article 3 , it also contains what seems to be an exhaustive list of exemptions from the proposed directive , although it could be useful to clarify this point .

I'll try to make that clear partially clear.

Thanks for clearing that up.

This is a key issue.

The next thing I'd like to be clear about is what this problem is, and what this problem isn't.

Better put that up.

This point deserves special emphasis.

This is a good point.

That's not the point.

Maybe I should clarify it.

I should clarify that.

And this is an important point.

But this is just the point.

So that's the bottom line.

And that's the crux of it.

This terror attack was a terror attack, period.

I completely understand this view.

We should, but it made exactly this point.

So let me summarize where we are.

And here's the point of that.

How did we reach this point?

How did we reach this point?

The teapot problem I'll pose this way.

To clarify the religious view on homosexuality.

Maybe you could enlighten me.

And this is where you come in.

Let's start with how I got to this point.

That's not my point at all.

But so can enlightened self interest.

That would be a mildly arrogant viewpoint.

What's the capital structure up until this point?

So, this was the terminal point for silk route.

And I ask myself, Why have things come to this?

Okay, so here's where we started.

Plants are not living creatures this is the point.

There was a vote on this matter.

But this view is no longer tenable.

This is the passive transformation point of view.

Would you mind clearing up a few points for me?

This was the lowest point this spread had reached since early 1997 .

Another thing is that we're just going to have to deal with this knowledge.

Failure to recognize this point can have significant consequences.