The second step, known as the inductive step, is to prove that the given bold'>statement for any one natural number implies the given bold'>statement for the next natural number.

There is an old saying that 'All are equal before the law'.

Tom said the bold'>claim wasn't true.

The bold'>statement is not wholly true.

A set of axioms is (simply) consistent if there is no bold'>statement such that both the bold'>statement and its negation are provable from the axioms.

His best known bold'>bold'>assertion is that Property is Theft!

Many people will doubt this bold'>claim.

It's such a simple bold'>statement.

So that's kind of a bold bold'>statement.

It's a very serious allegation.

If (A) is false, then This bold'>statement is false is false.

This would mean that (D1) is false.

Positive atheism is the explicit bold'>bold'>affirmation that gods do not exist.

GV We are living in a time of identity bold'>bold'>affirmation.

Undecidability of a bold'>statement in a particular deductive system does not, in and of itself, address the question of whether the truth value of the bold'>statement is well defined, or whether it can be determined by other means.

Leonardo tells the story of the consternation that this bold'>statement caused to the twelve followers of Jesus.

Based on this folk etymology, some historians guessed that the first inhabitants of this city might have been the Dorians.

So this is a very bold bold'>statement.

But that's a probabilistic bold'>statement.

In a positive bold'>bold'>affirmation, Wael Eskandar wrote

The bold'>statement is not wholly true.

The minister contradicted his own bold'>statement.

The line was greeted with prolonged applause and understandably so.

You already know enough to tell me what's wrong with this bold'>statement?

This bold'>claim is not supported by the evidence.

There is no basis for this bold'>statement.

If it means, This bold'>statement is not true , then it is negating itself.

There is a general bold'>statement and four clauses.

Such conditional bold'>statements are provable in ZF when the original bold'>statements are provable from ZF and the axiom of choice.

I have always blundered ... All my life I believed I knew nothing, yes, knew nothing.

He believed her bold'>bold'>assertion to be simply impossible and assented to the proposal.

Look at the industry for self image and the jobs it creates, the revenue it turns over.

A set of axioms is complete if, for any bold'>statement in the axioms' language, either that bold'>statement or its negation is provable from the axioms.

Now I give you, from our research, a very short bold'>claim.

His remark was not intended to be a factual bold'>statement.

Someday we may find some slight hole in that argument.

This bold'>claim would become standard in anarchist works.

While his bold'>bold'>assertion was not initially well received, later intensive field studies of fossil beds lent weight to his bold'>claim.

Was it evidence of guilt, an bold'>bold'>assertion that he should have been put away longer?

So my provocative bold'>statement is that we desperately need a serious scientific theory of cities.

The hypotheses are conjectures about a statistical model of the population, which are based on a sample of the population.

Thus Socrates is a man, all men are mortal therefore Socrates is mortal is clearly an argument (a valid one at that), because it is clear it is asserted that Socrates is mortal follows from the preceding bold'>statements.

Another misconception about the gender equality initiative was the notion that teaching gender theory will be made mandatory in schools.

But that day, it occurred to me what if that grammar is nothing more than a self serving conceit?

But I wanted to point out that the bold'>bold'>assertion of minority rights was widely bold'>claimed in the June protests.