We understand.

We never do.

We understand that.

We understand that completely.

We understand you perfectly.

We understand you perfectly.

We can take a hint.

We can take a hint.

We fast track. We figure out the game.

We understand your anger.

We didn't really understand that.

But we do not completely understand why.

Metaphorical thinking is essential to how we understand ourselves and others, how we communicate, learn, discover and invent.

We don't understand the code used by the brain.

We don't, however, really understand at a mathematical level.

we understand that it's expensive here about 30,000 dollars.

The West, as I would see it, comes out of that decade weakened, because we didn't understand the group.

We tend to retreat and say, We can draw a picture, we can post some graphs, we get it, we understand how this works.

We understand our limitations, and we build around it.

At Global Voices, we understand that we, collectively, are the Internet.

So as leaders, we understand that intangibles are important, but we don't have a clue how to measure them.

So, how do we make and understand metaphors?

Okay, so how do we understand this?

We kick them, we hit them, we drop them, just to make sure we understand how, where would they break.

Because we understand very little about most human diseases.

And we don't understand why they won't let us in. Right?

Now, my concern is, we Dems, too often, not so much.

Do we really understand more about the fabric of reality than we do about the fabric which emerges from our human interactions?

Sustainability is complicated but dinner is a reality that we all very much understand.

We understand.

As Dirk Helbing pointed out in the last quote, we don't really understand the complexity that relates to us, that surrounds us.

We don't understand how it works yet, but we have to.

So now what we understand is that all bacteria can talk to each other.

We want to know this is 50 years ago, Surely, you're thinking, we've figured it out by now.

As a result, we d all feel perfectly secure and have a good time but because we all understood the rules and we agreed on them together.

So, then, we understand that if we want to change our trajectory, in life, or in the balloon, we have to change altitude.

We look at these pictures and we understand, for the first time, our role in this supply chain.

Now Ken and I are not naive, and we understand that you need to have rules.

It's an eternal metric. There's an eternal metric about us sort of saying, do we understand the world? Am I making predictions? And so on.

We believe that you should always understand the risks that you're taking, and we will not invest in things we don't understand.

So do we really understand what it is, or are we trying to get what we think it is?

Writing is not a language but a form of technology.

Okay, we got that.

I think we got it.

In particular, what can all of us do? For those of you who are interested in these choices, there are lots of things you can do. There's a lot that we don't understand, and that we need to understand. And there's a lot that we already do understand, but aren't doing, and that we need to be doing. Thank you.