Especially since you have me backing you up.

And if we did that, then Google would back this.

Is it going to adhere to the principle of Community solidarity?

However, it must also be based on individuals.

If we know people who are planning to support orphanages, we should convince them to support family services instead.

If we want to support the market, we must support the transportation necessary for export to places further afield.

If we know people who are planning to support orphanages, we should convince them to support family services instead.

You need efforts to supplement schools.

He has a strong shoulder for you to lean on.

If we're not allowed to maneuver, we've got to support these positions.

45 pounds, and stop leaning on us.

Kingdom Government.

And if we did that, then Google would back this.

If we are being realistic, we might have to stop supporting Sony.

And it is here we have to be extremely careful in our support.

(More than 32 Members rose in support of this request)

If the change were to be adopted I would be able to vote in favour of Amendment No 118.

This is an important venture which we must all support.

I asked myself, therefore, whether I should support this result or not.

If nobody'll back me up to bust her outta that jail...

Its products are not carried by any must have brand.

Let them talk of former Yugoslavia, of the European Monetary System, of asylum, of immigration, of a new European Constitution anyone who applauds Rabin and Arafat must look at himself in the mirror and say 'Which direction am I going in?

Should we not also consider whether this is an area where we can make a contribution?

I hope you will be able to endorse Amendment No 22, nevertheless.

Both are objectives of the Treaty and each can support the other.

It was much fuller and more demanding than this one.

To be in favour of this resolution is not necessarily to be in favour of arms production per se.

Then they said We want to put its principles fully into practice. Why not just agree to it then?

The people of Europe have had enough of the in terminable disputes over the budget, over what, in national terms, seem to be very small amounts of money.

This is not just an issue of support for non governmental organisations it is also about our support for the whole principle of good governance.

The Jews say The Christians are not right, and the Christians say The Jews are in the wrong yet both read the Scriptures and this is what the unread had said too.

And the Jews said, The Christians are nothing and the Christians said, The Jews are nothing whereas they both read the Book and the ignorant spoke similarly so Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection, concerning the matter in which they dispute.

The Jews say, 'The Christians stand not on anything' the Christians say, 'The Jews stand not on anything' yet they recite the Book.

And the Jews say the Nazarenes are not grounded on aught and the Nazarenes say the Jews are not grounded on aught While they recite the same Book.

The Jews said that the Christians follow nothing (i.e. are not on the right religion) and the Christians said that the Jews follow nothing (i.e. are not on the right religion) though they both recite the Scripture.

The Jews say, The Christians are not based on anything and the Christians say, The Jews are not based on anything. Yet they both read the Scripture.

The Jews say that the Christians have nothing (of the Truth) and the Christians say that the Jews have nothing of it, though both read the Scripture.

And the Jews say the Christians follow nothing (true), and the Christians say the Jews follow nothing (true) yet both are readers of the Scripture.

The Jews say, The Christians stand on nothing, and the Christians say, The Jews stand on nothing, though they follow the same Book.

The Jews say the Nazarenes are not on anything, and the Nazarenes say it is the Jews who are not on anything. Yet they both read the Book.

The Jews say The Christians have nothing true to stand on, and the Christians say, The Jews have nothing to stand on, although they both recite the Scripture.

The Jews accuse the Christians of having no basis for their religion and the Christians accuse the Jews of having no basis for their religion, even though both sides read the Scripture.

And the Jews say The Christians do not follow anything (good) and the Christians say The Jews do not follow anything (good) while they recite the (same) Book.

The Jews say, The Christians have no ground to stand on, and the Christians say, The Jews have no ground to stand on.

The Jews say The Christians have naught (to stand) upon and the Christians say The Jews have naught (To stand) upon.